throw them RIGHT AND EXTREME RIGHT
Yesterday, watching La Noria Telecinco program runs, so to speak, journalist Jordi González - yes, what happens, see La Noria, each has his private vices, mine is see "telemierda" the weekend is what you get - Participants in the "political agenda" debated over who was more the fault of today have almost five million unemployed, Aznar and Zapatero. The question is biased, as all he does "telemierda", so suffice to say that the single party is responsible for all, given that only the party has governed in a democracy, except for a brief period (1978-1981) and that, consequently, both Gonzalez, Aznar and Zapatero are responsible aliquots. The question seems more relevant is the Deputy Prime Minister unveiled the Don Alfredo Pérez Rubalcaba - likely candidate for the Presidency of the Government in 2012 and target of the wrath of the conservative sector of the single party - who said very clearly his fellow, meeting in order to receive a dose of "soma" (A. Huxley, dixit) that the PP is the extreme right and did the Marxist style, that is, from Groucho Marx - Do not think - like this: "They look like the far right, they behave like the extreme right, but do not be fooled, are the extreme right. "
My girl, who holds the delusional view that everyone is good until proven otherwise, was surprised that Don Alfredo speak so harshly of the PP, which clearly is not an extremist party right. Since I have: learning and listening to Don Enric Sopena my nerves because I do not know if I would become charging hagiographer muchachada ZP and faithful as this man, I explained to my wife what's going on. It's actually easy, very easy, simple Cartesian or Aristotelian logic, it does not matter, because everything is summed up in that if the PSOE has slipped so much toward the political center, seeking enough votes to consolidate the ideological ballast Shift and dropping to sacks, which was passed and is now in the territory of the right, the PP, which was there earlier and had begun a journey to the center that eventually led to Dolores Cospedal consider his party as "the Workers' Party, the PSOE only be distinguished from the PP, at least rhetorically, saying without shame that the PP is not right - because the right is now owned by the PSOE - but extreme right. It's a logical question, given that the center, as everyone knows, there and there is nobody there, so that mass parties, which by definition have no ideology, which knows Felipe González Márquez but ideology, that is different, competing for the same electorate, save, of course, the supporters themselves.
Well, now I say to you and who will listen: the only party, PPSOE, neither is right nor left, nor does ideology, is a mass party capable of holding within it all ideologies known, using the known method of saying yes to everything and promise everyone around, telling all who will listen that you want to hear. Then apply the well-known axiom that reads, "promising to get stuck and after, nothing promised, and everyone is happy, markets and IMF through. That within the single party, as happened in the nationalist movement, have different "sensitivities" is inherent and irrelevant, serving only to form two fishing nets, one that defines "conservative" and another which defines "progressive" sad imitation of the dynastic parties of the Restoration. Therefore, if you vote for either wing of one party what they are doing is voting for one party, you will see what they do, but I'm not going to do, I'll vote for the leftist party that remains - is that I'm on the left -, IU. You can vote their ideas to what they see fit, but if I do not vote to favor one party, thanks.